Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Approach for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Research Participation

Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Approach for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Research Participation
Sarah L. Mayer, Michelle R. Brajcich, Lionola Juste, Jesse Y. Hsu, Nadir Yehya
Original Investigation Pediatrics
JAMA Network Open, 15 May 2024
Key Points
Question
Are sociodemographic factors associated with rates of approach and consent for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) research?
Findings
This cohort study of 3154 children found disparities in approach and consent according to race and ethnicity, language, religion, and degree of social deprivation. Lower consent rates were partly mediated by lower approach rates, with reduced approach mediating approximately half of the lower rates of consent for Black children.
Meaning
In this study, multiple sociodemographic variables were associated with disparate consent rates for PICU research, and strategies to increase approaches could contribute to equitable enrollment in PICU studies.

Abstract
Importance
While disparities in consent rates for research have been reported in multiple adult and pediatric settings, limited data informing enrollment in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) research are available. Acute care settings such as the PICU present unique challenges for study enrollment, given the highly stressful and emotional environment for caregivers and the time-sensitive nature of the studies.
Objective
To determine whether race and ethnicity, language, religion, and Social Deprivation Index (SDI) were associated with disparate approach and consent rates in PICU research.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This retrospective cohort study was performed at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia PICU between July 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. Participants included patients eligible for studies requiring prospective consent. Data were analyzed from February 2 to July 26, 2022.
Exposure
Exposures included race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White, and other), language (Arabic, English, Spanish, and other), religion (Christian, Jewish, Muslim, none, and other), and SDI (composite of multiple socioeconomic indicators).
Main Outcomes and Measures
Multivariable regressions separately tested associations between the 4 exposures (race and ethnicity, language, religion, and SDI) and 3 outcomes (rates of approach among eligible patients, consent among eligible patients, and consent among those approached). The degree to which reduced rates of approach mediated the association between lower consent in Black children was also assessed.
Results
Of 3154 children included in the study (median age, 6 [IQR, 1.9-12.5] years; 1691 [53.6%] male), rates of approach and consent were lower for Black and Hispanic families and those of other races, speakers of Arabic and other languages, Muslim families, and those with worse SDI. Among children approached for research, lower consent odds persisted for those of Black race (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.97]; adjusted OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.49-0.93]) relative to White race. Mediation analysis revealed that 51.0% (95% CI, 11.8%-90.2%) of the reduced odds of consent for Black individuals was mediated by lower probability of approach.
Conclusions and Relevance
In this cohort study of consent rates for PICU research, multiple sociodemographic factors were associated with lower rates of consent, partly attributable to disparate rates of approach. These findings suggest opportunities for reducing disparities in PICU research participation.

Leave a comment