Spotlight Article

This month we are spotlighting The Lived Experience of Pediatric Gene Therapy – A Scoping Review by Kimberly et al. In this Human Gene Therapy article the authors assess empirical research examining the lived experience of both patients and caregivers participating in pediatric gene therapy trials. Their scoping review underscores a serious gap in the literature leading to an examination of narrative accounts from trial participants and their families, and areas where further research in necessary. The authors note that:

[p. 4]
“…When making a decision about whether to enroll a child in a GT clinical trial, caregivers must weigh factors such as: the inability for most treatments to be repeated or re-dosed; uncertainty around the durability, efficacy, and safety of an experimental treatment; risk of a child’s disease progressing if they wait for an approved treatment or more safety data; and efficacy of existing approved alternative treatments… The confluence of these factors within a high-stakes decision-making framework creates a unique ethical context for pediatric rare disease patients and their parents and caregivers. The progressive nature of many of these diseases also adds a time constraint to participation…

[p. 16]
The field of pediatric GT research… has an important and timely opportunity to better understand how patients and their parents/caregivers choose whether or not to consider GT, and their lived experience of participating in clinical trials. Pediatric patients’ own perspectives are almost completely absent from the literature, marking an important area for future research efforts. Such insights from further research will inform more patient- and family-centered clinical trial design and can help to ensure that clinical trial design and implementation reflect patients’ and families’ values, their priorities, and their goals for care. This scoping review lays a foundation for future research in this space.”

The Lived Experience of Pediatric Gene Therapy – A Scoping Review
Laura Kimberly, Cara Hunt, Katherine Beaverson, Emma James, Alison Bateman-House, Richard McGowan, Jennifer DeSante-Bertkau
Human Gene Therapy, 15 November 2023
Abstract
Little is known about patients’ and families’ lived experience of participating in pediatric gene therapy (GT) clinical trials. Currently, pediatric GT research targets a broad range of indications––including rare and ultra-rare diseases––which vary in severity and in the availability of alternative therapies. Pediatric GT differs meaningfully from adult GT because the decision to participate involves a dyad of both the child and parent or caregiver/s. It is critical to understand patients’ and caregivers’ perceptions and experiences of the social, emotional, physical, and logistical burdens or benefits of participating in such trials, and how they weigh and prioritize these factors when deciding whether to participate. We conducted a scoping review of the current literature in this subject area with objectives to a) provide an overview of existing literature, b) identify gaps and areas for further research, and c) better understand the lived impact of pediatric GT research on patients and their parents/caregivers. , Four themes emerged, including 1) weighing risks and benefits 2) timing of GT trial participation 3) value of clear communication, and 4) potential impact on quality of life. Notably, our sample surfaced articles about how patients/parents/caregivers were thinking about GT – their understanding of its safety, efficacy, and risks – rather than accounts of their experiences, which was our initial intention. Nevertheless, our findings offer useful insights to improve the informed consent process and promote a more patient- and family-centered approach. Moreover, our findings can contribute to patient advocacy organizations’ efforts to develop educational materials tailored to patients’ and families’ expressed informational needs and perspectives, and can inform more patient- and family-centered policies from GT clinical trial sponsors.

Childhood vaccine refusal and what to do about it: a systematic review of the ethical literature

Childhood vaccine refusal and what to do about it: a systematic review of the ethical literature
Kerrie Wiley, Maria Christou-Ergos, Chris Degeling, Rosalind McDougall, Penelope Robinson, Katie Attwell, Catherine Helps, Shevaun Drislane, Stacy M Carter
Research
BMC Medical Ethics, 8 November 2023
Open Access
Abstract
Background
Parental refusal of routine childhood vaccination remains an ethically contested area. This systematic review sought to explore and characterise the normative arguments made about parental refusal of routine vaccination, with the aim of providing researchers, practitioners, and policymakers with a synthesis of current normative literature.
Methods
Nine databases covering health and ethics research were searched, and 121 publications identified for the period Jan 1998 to Mar 2022. For articles, source journals were categorised according to Australian Standard Field of Research codes, and normative content was analysed using a framework analytical approach.
Results
Most of the articles were published in biomedical journals (34%), bioethics journals (21%), and journals that carry both classifications (20%). Two central questions dominated the literature: (1) Whether vaccine refusal is justifiable (which we labelled ‘refusal arguments’); and (2) Whether strategies for dealing with those who reject vaccines are justifiable (‘response arguments’). Refusal arguments relied on principlism, religious frameworks, the rights and obligations of parents, the rights of children, the medico-legal best interests of the child standard, and the potential to cause harm to others. Response arguments were broadly divided into arguments about policy, arguments about how individual physicians should practice regarding vaccine rejectors, and both legal precedents and ethical arguments for vaccinating children against a parent’s will. Policy arguments considered the normative significance of coercion, non-medical or conscientious objections, and possible reciprocal social efforts to offset vaccine refusal. Individual physician practice arguments covered nudging and coercive practices, patient dismissal, and the ethical and professional obligations of physicians. Most of the legal precedents discussed were from the American setting, with some from the United Kingdom.

Shared decision-making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease and their parents: an exploratory study

Shared decision-making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease and their parents: an exploratory study
Ricardo Wijngaarde, Mijra Koning, Karin Fijnvandraat, Dirk Ubbink
European Journal of Pediatrics, 31 October 2023
Open access
Abstract
Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) face various healthcare choices to be made during the disease process that may impact their lives. Shared decision-making (SDM) could improve their health outcomes. We assessed if, and to what extent, paediatricians engage children with SCD and/or their parents in the decision-making process. In this observational cross-sectional study, paediatric SCD patients and their parents visiting the outpatient paediatrics clinic of a university hospital participated in a SDM baseline measurement. Two evaluators independently and objectively analysed the level of patient involvement in decision-making from the audio-recordings of the consultations using the OPTION-5 instrument, a 0–20-point scale from which scores are usually expressed as a percentage of ideal SDM. The level of SDM, as perceived by patients, parents and paediatricians, was appreciated using the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires, respectively. Scores could range from 0% (no SDM) to 100% (exemplary SDM). Twenty-four consultations in which a decision needed to be made about SCD treatment were audiotaped and analysed; six were from each paediatrician. The group consisted of 17 male and 7 female patients from various cultural backgrounds between 2 and 17 years old, with a mean age of 9.4 years (SD 4.2). Median OPTION-5 scores were 25.0% [IQR] 20.0–40.0%; range 0–55%). Median SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 56.7% (IQR 39.4–88.9%) and 68.9% (IQR 57.8–77.8%), respectively.
Conclusion
Although subjective scores of SDM were fair, the objectively scored level of SDM among children suffering from SCD leaves room for improvement. This may be realized by increasing knowledge about the benefits of SDM, child-centred SDM interventions and SDM-training for paediatricians that takes into account the complexity of intercultural challenges and risk communication between stakeholders.

Ethical Considerations for Engaging Children and Adolescents Living with HIV in Research in African Countries: A Systematic Review

Ethical Considerations for Engaging Children and Adolescents Living with HIV in Research in African Countries: A Systematic Review
Emma Gillette, Winstone Nyandiko, Ashley Chory, Michael Scanlon, Josephine Aluoch, Nandini Choudhury, Daniel Lagat, Celestine Ashimosi, Whitney Biegon, Dennis Munyoro, Janet Lidweye, Jack Nyagaya, Ilene Wilets, Allison DeLong, Rami Kantor, Rachel Vreeman, Violet Naanyu
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 23 October 2023
Abstract
Research engaging children and adolescents living with HIV (CALWH) is critical for youth-friendly services and HIV care, and researchers need to ensure that such engagement is ethical. We conducted a systematic review to identify key ethical considerations for the engagement of CALWH in research. The review focused on primary research articles conducted in African countries that examined ethical issues in CALWH engaged in research. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria; the following seven key domains were extracted: 1) justifications for engaging CALWH in research; 2) community involvement; 3) informed consent/assent; 4) caregiver involvement; 5) perceptions of benefits; 6) perception of the risks of involvement; and 7) confidentiality. These domains can inform the ethical engagement of CALWH in research.

Ethical and Legal Nuances in Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Ethical and Legal Nuances in Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Book Chapter
Pratibha Gehlawat, Tanu Gupta
Handbook of Research on Child and Adolescent Psychology Practices and Interventions, 2023 [IGI Global]
Abstract
Child and adolescent psychiatry are mainly concerned with the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders in child and adolescent populations. The children are vulnerable and their ability to understand matters related to their well-being is restricted. Common ethical issues in children and adolescents include assent, consent, autonomy, confidentiality, justice, and equity. The chapter discusses ethical issues as well as the difficulties faced in following ethics. The chapter outlines the summary of the existing laws pertaining to children and adolescents in India including the basic rights and criminal responsibility. The laws related to child and adolescent mental health are discussed in detail. The provisions related to treatment of minors under Mental Health Care Act, 2017 is discussed along with the critical appraisal. Critical appraisal of other relevant laws/Acts allied to children and adolescent mental health is discussed. The need for formal training of all mental health professionals regarding the laws and acts of the land is also highlighted.

Young Children as Co-Researchers: Authentic Partnership in an Early Childhood Context

Young Children as Co-Researchers: Authentic Partnership in an Early Childhood Context
Book Chapter
Catherine Kelly, Fionnuala Waldron, Thérèse Dooley
Pushing the Boundaries of Human Rights Education, 2023 [Routledge]
Abstract
Under Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), children have the right to express their views freely and to have those views given due consideration in accordance with their age and maturity; this right also applies in the context of research. Premised on changing conceptions of children and childhoods and on the impact of Article 12 of the UNCRC, the active participation of children in research has become standard practice for researchers whose work is focused on children’s lives and the complex nature of such practice is well-documented. However, age remains a limiting factor and less attention has been given to the idea of very young children as co-researchers and to the methodological and ethical tensions that might ensue from such an approach. Guided by a children’s rights framework, this chapter examines the idea of engaging with young children (5–6 years) as co-researchers in a classroom context. Ultimately, the chapter argues that, while the idea of children as co-researchers in the context of early childhood education is a challenging one, through the use of innovative approaches which prioritise children’s participation, perceived barriers relating to age and maturity can be substantially overcome, resulting in research findings that are grounded in children’s perspectives and experiences.

Parental views on prospective consent: experience from a pilot neonatal randomized control trial

Parental views on prospective consent: experience from a pilot neonatal randomized control trial
Original Research
Hannah Skelton, Patricia Viola, Traci-Anne Goyen, Pranav Jani
Frontiers in Pediatrics, November 2023
Abstract
Objective
To explore parental perceptions of the consenting process and understanding of the study in a pilot Randomized Controlled Trial wherein extremely premature infants (<29 weeks’ gestation) were recruited either antenatally or by 4-hours of age. We prospectively interviewed parents who had consented, declined consent and missed eligible infants in the Positioning Preterm Infants for Neuroprotection (PIN) study, a low-risk intervention study. Structured interview questions explored the process and acceptability of the consenting approach by the parents and their knowledge of the study. Additional comments made by the parents were transcribed verbatim.
Results
Sixty-two parents participated in the interviews, of those 41 had provided their consent, 8 declined consent and 13 were parents of missed eligible infants. Overall, most parents reported they understood the study well before providing their consent and approaching them for consenting did not create a burden for them. A verbal explanation of the study by the study team, especially by the medical practitioners, was viewed as beneficial. It was suggested that the 4-hour period for obtaining postnatal consent may be too short. A deferred consent with a follow-up opportunity for obtaining informed consent could be a suitable alternative. Parents found the consenting process acceptable and that they had sufficient understanding of the study to provide an informed consent. Deferred consent should be explored for future, low-risk intervention studies as an alternative to prospective consent where infants need to be recruited in the immediate neonatal period.

The ethics of informed consent for infants born to adolescents: A case study from Malaysia

The ethics of informed consent for infants born to adolescents: A case study from Malaysia
Research Article
Jeffrey Soon-Yit Lee, Benjamin Wei-Liang Ng, Mohammad Firdaus bin Abdul Aziz
Clinical Ethics, 17 October 2023
Abstract
Adolescent pregnancy results from the complex interaction between various internal and external vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities persist after the infant’s birth when the adolescent becomes a parent. Adolescent parents are unfairly stereotyped as unmotivated and incompetent. Some legislations prohibit adolescents from giving consent on the grounds of incompetency. Despite being different, “competency” is frequently used interchangeably with “capacity”; thus, incompetent individuals are often mistaken to lack capacity. Consequently, legally incompetent adolescents who became parents are frequently disregarded during their infant’s decision-making process. This article discusses the distinction between the competence and capacity of adolescent parents, the various vulnerabilities that contribute to an adolescent’s incompetency, and advocates respect for the adolescent’s capacity in making decisions for her infant. We propose a workflow for obtaining informed consent for infants born to adolescents ethically guided by the respect for individuals principle while staying within the country’s legal framework.

Engaging with hard-to-reach children and parents using a creative methodology

Engaging with hard-to-reach children and parents using a creative methodology
Kylie Poppe, Angela Abela
Qualitative Research, 12 October 2023
Abstract
This paper delves into the creative methodology adopted whilst engaging in a research study with five families whose young children (aged between 8 and 10 years old) were excluded from school due to social, emotional and mental health difficulties. The complex needs surrounding these families often lead to them being labelled as hard-to-reach and therefore challenging to engage in research. This paper will explore these challenges, the ethical dilemmas that emerged, the constant observation throughout, the reflexivity and flexibility required by the researchers and the relationships forged. Using various creative methods as part of the Mosaic approach both the children and their parents were able to play a part in the meaning-making process throughout the research journey. The culmination of the research study took place in the format of a multi-family group session which provided a safe space for an intergenerational encounter allowing for the children’s and parent’s authentic voices to continue to be heard.

A cultural-historical exploration of relational ethics in research involving children

A cultural-historical exploration of relational ethics in research involving children
Review Article
Gloria Quinones, Niina Rutanen, Yaiza Lucas Revilla
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, October 2023; 42
Abstract
Participatory studies involving children are a growing topic of debate concerning research on early childhood education and care (ECEC). Developments in ethnographic methods and the use of video recordings to collect data have raised new challenges for researchers who study children regarding such issues as formal procedures for informed consent and obtaining children’s assent to research encounters. A growing number of studies have explored children’s and researchers’ relationships, as well as the ethical aspects of research encounters. We contribute to this discussion by adopting a cultural-historical (wholeness) approach to research that involves children, partnering as researchers with a child participant. By using a cultural-historical approach, we analyzed a critical incident that involved a child’s assent and dissent process through dynamic motive orientations. We focused on the importance of considering dynamic motive orientation as researchers navigate new ethical challenges. Our findings reveal that adopting a wholeness approach requires researchers to serve as activity partners, reflecting on and recalibrating their own motives and centering child participants in the research process.