Security and Privacy Requirements for Electronic Consent: A Systematic Literature Review
Research Article
Stef Verreydt, Koen Yskout, Wouter Joosen
ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare, March 2021; 2(2)
Abstract
Electronic consent (e-consent) has the potential to solve many paper-based consent approaches. Existing approaches, however, face challenges regarding privacy and security. This literature review aims to provide an overview of privacy and security challenges and requirements proposed by papers discussing e-consent implementations, as well as the manner in which state-of-the-art solutions address them. We conducted a systematic literature search using ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed Central. We included papers providing comprehensive discussions of one or more technical aspects of e-consent systems. Thirty-one papers met our inclusion criteria. Two distinct topics were identified, the first being discussions of e-consent representations and the second being implementations of e-consent in data sharing systems. The main challenge for e-consent representations is gathering the requirements for a “valid” consent. For the implementation papers, many provided some requirements but none provided a comprehensive overview. Blockchain is identified as a solution to transparency and trust issues in traditional client-server systems, but several challenges hinder it from being applied in practice. E-consent has the potential to grant data subjects control over their data. However, there is no agreed-upon set of security and privacy requirements that must be addressed by an e-consent platform. Therefore, security- and privacy-by-design techniques should be an essential part of the development lifecycle for such a platform.
Month: April 2021
A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information
A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information
Lydia A. Bazzano, Jaquail Durant, Paula Rhode Brantley
Ochsner Journal, March 2021; 21 pp 81–85
Open Access
Abstract
Background
The concept of informed consent has evolved significantly with regard to both the practice of medicine and research conducted with human volunteers. Yet the process of informed consent used in clinical research and the lengthy consent documents that are difficult to comprehend have been criticized.
Methods
We review the history of informed consent as a legal and regulatory concept and the intended impact of the new key information section, a requirement that was introduced in the 2017 revisions to the Common Rule.
Results
The key information section is intended to be a concise and focused presentation at the beginning of the informed consent document that facilitates potential participants’ comprehension of the research. However, the lack of regulatory guidance regarding content and length has been problematic. To avoid the risk of noncompliance, many institutions have sought safe harbor by following the limited format guidelines included in the preamble to the revisions to the Common Rule.
Conclusion
Research examining formats for the key information section and aids to increasing potential participants’ understanding of a research project should be conducted to ensure that the new regulations achieve the original intent rather than simply lengthening an already lengthy paper document. In addition, the human research protections community should evaluate whether the key information section increases research participants’ understanding of what they will be undertaking in a particular study.
Editor’s note: The Ochsner Journal is a peer-reviewed quarterly medical journal published by the Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation.
Comparison of notice requirements for consent between ISO/IEC 29184:2020 and General Data Protection Regulation
Comparison of notice requirements for consent between ISO/IEC 29184:2020 and General Data Protection Regulation
Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Georg Philip Krog
Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, Spring 2021; 4(2)
Abstract
This paper analyses the ISO/IEC 29184:2020 standard and compares its requirements for notice and consent with those specified by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). More specifically, it considers the extent to which the ISO/IEC 29184 standard can be applied to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the GDPR and to identify the additional requirements in areas where it is not sufficient. The paper concludes with remarks on the potential role of ISO/IEC 29184 as a certification mechanism under the GDPR for consent and notice.
Informed Consent of Minors with a Special Focus on the Czech Legal Regulation
Informed Consent of Minors with a Special Focus on the Czech Legal Regulation
Tomáš Doležal
The Lawyer Quarterly, January 2021; 11(1) pp 126-140
Open Access
Abstract
This article is focused on the examination of the law concerning medical treatment of minors, that is, persons under the age of 18. The first part of this article brings a short overview of the international documents regulating the rights of the child and specifically children’s rights within the area of health care provision. This article analyzes the issue of the maturity and competence of children and discusses whether persons under the age of 18 may be regarded as being capable of consenting to medical treatment. Furthermore this article brings a short comparative overview of the laws concerning medical treatment of minors in different countries and tries to extract the common features of the regulations in the different countries. Finally, the last and longest part of this article analyzes the issue of the capacity of minors to consent to medical treatment in the territory of the Czech Republic from the historical perspective and brings a structured overview of this issue under the current Czech laws.
Towards building a culturally informed consent process in Central Asia
Towards building a culturally informed consent process in Central Asia
Research Article
Christopher M. Whitsel, Martha C. Merrill
Central Asian Survey, 26 March 2021
Abstract
Researchers working in Central Asia often report difficulty obtaining Western-style signed informed consent statements. The principles underlying informed consent were developed in cultures characterized by low-power distance and individualism, low context communication and a rules basis, whereas many Central Asian cultures emphasize high-power distance, collectivism, high-context communication and relationships. Yet, consent is an important principle. We interviewed scholars who grew up in Central Asia, but completed graduate work in the United States, Canada or the UK, to ask their recommendations for developing a culturally appropriate consent process. The common themes that arose include working within a network, building relationships of trust with potential participants and not utilizing legal-type documentation as a basis for consent.
Providing emergency medical care without consent: How the ‘emergency principle’ in Australian law protects against claims of trespass
Providing emergency medical care without consent: How the ‘emergency principle’ in Australian law protects against claims of trespass
Sam Boyle, Nikola Stepanov
Emergency Medicine Australasia, 24 March 2021
Abstract
In a medical emergency, the usual requirement to obtain consent before giving treatment does not apply. This exception to the general rule on consent to medical treatment is known as the ‘emergency principle’. By considering a case scenario, and by adjusting the facts to this scenario, we explain the circumstances in which the emergency principle will protect practitioners from an action in trespass. Although the fundamentals of this principle are uncontroversial, there are a number of uncertainties and inconsistencies in this law in relation to certain parameters. For example, whether a practitioner would ever be obliged to seek consent from a substitute decision‐maker before providing emergency treatment is not clearly or consistently explained. We suggest the law should be clarified.
Informed Consent in the Health Care System: An Overview from a Dental Perspective in Saudi Arabia
Informed Consent in the Health Care System: An Overview from a Dental Perspective in Saudi Arabia
Review Article
Nassar A.A., Demyati A.K.
Saudi Journal of Health Systems Research, March 2021; 1 pp 11–15
Open Access
Abstract
Background
Patient autonomy in the health care system is achieved by the vital principle of providing informed consent. Throughout history, informed consent gained recognition and improved to include more aids and steps to formalize and standardize the process of obtaining proper consent in medical and dental practice. Regardless of the type of informed consent obtained before the treatment, it should include an adequate understandable description of nature and diagnosis of the disease, treatment plan, proper alternatives, risks, and limitations.
Summary
There is limited information in the ethics literature covering critical concepts related to different dental procedures in Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, informed consent in dentistry is not well-documented. As everything is evolving and changing in Saudi society, litigation has progressed and impacted dentistry. This overview will help in addressing aspects related to informed consent and closing the gaps in the dental health care system in Saudi Arabia, managing complex ethical issues associated with dental patients. In addition, providing recommendations and shedding some light on the importance of informed consent will improve the situation of the informed consent process in Saudi Arabia.
Key Messages
Informed consent allows patients to be part of the decision-making process, and it provides legal protection for the practitioners from practice lawsuit cases. Dentists should take extra care in documenting the consent process and patient’s choice regarding their treatment to avoid unfavorable consequences. In Saudi Arabia, attention should be drawn toward the crucial role of informed consent, and more studies should be published in order to enrich the knowledge and to improve the health care system.
Understanding Exception from Informed Consent in Planned Emergency Research
Understanding Exception from Informed Consent in Planned Emergency Research
Understanding Research
CourtneyEdwards, Kimberly D. Johnson
Journal of Emergency Nursing, 11 March 2021
Abstract
Many of the current accepted treatment practices provided to patients in the first critical hour after a traumatic injury, stroke, or cardiac arrest have not been rigorously tested in clinical research trials. The inability to obtain informed consent is often a barrier to research in emergency, time-sensitive situations in which the patient is not able to provide informed consent nor is their family member immediately available to provide consent on behalf of the patient. Planned emergency research, often with exception from informed consent, is a type of research study that involves a patient with a life-threatening medical condition that requires urgent interventions, wherein the current treatments may be unproven or suboptimal, and who, because of their current condition, is unable to provide informed consent. This article summarizes the necessary components for using exception from informed consent in planned emergency research. Understanding the research design, particularly research processes specific to time-critical emergency situations, will ensure that the care provided by stretcher-side emergency nurses will result in optimal patient outcomes and is an integral aspect of emergency nursing practice.
Are we undermining the value of palliative care through advanced cancer clinical trial consent language?
Are we undermining the value of palliative care through advanced cancer clinical trial consent language?
Commentary
Puja J. Umaretiya, Jennifer P. Rubin, Jennifer M. Snaman, Christina Ullrich, Angela M. Feraco, Veronica Dussel, Joanne Wolfe, Elisha Waldman
Cancer, 10 March 2021
Abstract
Informed consents for advanced cancer trials contain language that misrepresents palliative care as an alternative to trial participation. This language should be revised to highlight that palliative care is appropriate at any point in the illness trajectory and alongside disease‐directed therapy.
[Expert consensus on informed consent for vaccination (part two)]
[Expert consensus on informed consent for vaccination (part two)]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi
Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, 1 March 2021; 42(3) pp 369-399
Abstract
The Vaccine Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China and other relevant laws require that vaccine recipients or their guardians be educated about vaccines and how they work, and described in general the methods and contents of such vaccination education. With the new law and “Standard Operational Procedures for Immunization” as foundation documents, and in consultation with experts at home and abroad, the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association developed a consensus statement about informed consent for vaccination. This consensus statement is written for disease control and prevention health care personnel in vaccination services and describes the educational content of informed consent, a theoretical framework for immunization and immunization knowledge, the informed consent processes, principles of planning for vaccination, and an informed consent form. Part Two of the consensus includes influenza vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, haemophilus influenzae type b containing vaccine, enterovirus type 71 inactivated vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, varicella attenuated live vaccine, herpes-zoster vaccine, human papillomavirus vaccine, rabies vaccine, hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome vaccine, leptospira vaccine, anthrax vaccine, hepatitis E vaccine, cholera vaccine, typhoid vaccine, and tick-borne encephalitis vaccine.
Editor’s Note: This is a Chinese language publication