Thinking about the idea of consent in data science genomics: How ‘informed’ is it?

Thinking about the idea of consent in data science genomics: How ‘informed’ is it?
Original Article
Jennifer Greenwood, Andrew Crowden
Nursing Philosophy, 12 May 2021
Abstract
In this paper we argue that ‘informed’ consent in Big Data genomic biobanking is frequently less than optimally informative. This is due to the particular features of genomic biobanking research which render it ethically problematic. We discuss these features together with details of consent models aimed to address them. Using insights from consent theory, we provide a detailed analysis of the essential components of informed consent which includes recommendations to improve consent performance. In addition, and using insights from philosophy of mind and language and psycholinguistics we support our analyses by identifying the nature and function of concepts (ideas) operational in human cognition and language together with an implicit coding/decoding model of human communication. We identify this model as the source of patients/participants poor understanding. We suggest an alternative, explicit model of human communication, namely, that of relevance-theoretic inference which obviates the limitations of the code model. We suggest practical strategies to assist health service professionals to ensure that the specific information they provide concerning the proposed treatment or research is used to inform participants’ decision to consent. We do not prescribe a standard, formal approach to decision-making where boxes are ticked; rather, we aim to focus attention towards the sorts of considerations and questions that might usefully be borne in mind in any consent situation. We hope that our theorising will be of real practical benefit to nurses and midwives working on the clinical and research front-line of genomic science.

Trust, but Verify: Informed Consent, AI Technologies, and Public Health Emergencies

Trust, but Verify: Informed Consent, AI Technologies, and Public Health Emergencies
Brian Pickering
Future Internet, 18 May 2021; 13 (132)
Open Access
Abstract
To use technology or engage with research or medical treatment typically requires user consent: agreeing to terms of use with technology or services, or providing informed consent for research participation, for clinical trials and medical intervention, or as one legal basis for processing personal data. Introducing AI technologies, where explainability and trustworthiness are focus items for both government guidelines and responsible technologists, imposes additional challenges. Understanding enough of the technology to be able to make an informed decision, or consent, is essential but involves an acceptance of uncertain outcomes. Further, the contribution of AI-enabled technologies not least during the COVID-19 pandemic raises ethical concerns about the governance associated with their development and deployment. Using three typical scenarios— contact tracing, big data analytics and research during public emergencies—this paper explores a trust-based alternative to consent. Unlike existing consent-based mechanisms, this approach sees consent as a typical behavioural response to perceived contextual characteristics. Decisions to engage derive from the assumption that all relevant stakeholders including research participants will negotiate on an ongoing basis. Accepting dynamic negotiation between the main stakeholders as proposed here introduces a specifically socio–psychological perspective into the debate about human responses to artificial intelligence. This trust-based consent process leads to a set of recommendations for the ethical use of advanced technologies as well as for the ethical review of applied research projects.

A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent

A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent
Research
Elizabeth Hutchings, Max Loomes, Phyllis Butow, Frances M. Boyle
Systematic Reviews, 4 May 2021; 10(132)
Open Access
Abstract
Background
We aimed to synthesise data on issues related to stakeholder perceptions of consent for the use of secondary data. To better understand the current literature available, we conducted a systematic literature review of healthcare consumer attitudes towards the secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data.
Methods
EMBASE/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Informit Health Collection, PROSPERO Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO and ProQuest databases were searched. Eligible articles included those reporting qualitative or quantitative original research and published in English. No restrictions were placed on publication dates, study design or disease setting. One author screened articles for eligibility and two authors were involved in the full-text review process. Conflicts were resolved by consensus. Quality and bias were assessed using the QualSyst criteria for qualitative studies.
Results
This paper focuses on a subset of 47 articles identified from the wider search and focuses on the issue of consent. Issues related to privacy, trust and transparency, and attitudes of healthcare professionals and researchers to secondary use and sharing of data have been dealt with in previous publications. Studies included a total of 216,149 respondents. Results indicate that respondents are generally supportive of using health data for research, particularly if the data is de-identified or anonymised. The requirement by participants to obtain consent prior to the use of health data for research was not universal, nor is the requirement for this always supported by legislation. Many respondents believed that either no consent or being informed of the research, but not providing additional consent, were sufficient.
Conclusions
These results indicate that individuals should be provided with information and choice about how their health data is used and, where feasible, a mechanism to opt-out should be provided. To increase the acceptability of using health data for research, health organisations and data custodians must provide individuals with concise information about data protection mechanisms and under what circumstances their data may be used and by whom.

Informed Consent for Online Research—Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms

Informed Consent for Online Research—Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms
Research Article
Caitlin Geier, Robyn B. Adams, Katharine M. Mitchell, Bree E. Holtz
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 24 May 2021
Abstract
Informed consent is an important part of the research process; however, some participants either do not read or skim the consent form. When participants do not read or comprehend informed consent, then they may not understand the potential benefits, risks, or details of the study before participating. This study used previous research to develop experimentally manipulated online consent forms utilizing various presentations of the consent form and interactive elements. Participants (n = 576) were randomly exposed to one of six form variations. Results found that the highly interactive condition was significantly better for comprehension than any of the other conditions. The highly interactive condition also performed better for readability, though not significantly. Further research should explore the effects of interactive elements to combat habituation and to engage participants with the parts of the consent form unique to the study.

Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania

Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania
Research Article
Marta S. Palmeirim, Ulfat A. Mohammed, Amanda Ross, Shaali M. Ame, Said M Ali, Jennifer Keiser
PLoS Neglected Tropical Disease, 14 May 2021
Abstract
Background
Clinical trial participants are required to sign an informed consent form (ICF). However, information is lacking on the most effective methods to convey trial relevant information prior to inviting participants to sign the ICF, being particularly pertinent in low income countries. A previous study on Pemba Island, Tanzania, found that an oral information session (IS) was significantly better than providing an ICF alone. However, knowledge gaps remained. Building on these findings, we investigated the effect of adding a slideshow or a theater to the IS in the informed consent procedure of an anthelminthic clinical trial.
Methodology/principal findings
A total of 604 caregivers were randomized into the control group that only received an ICF (n = 150) or an ICF plus one of three intervention strategies: (i) verbal IS (n = 135), (ii) verbal IS with a slideshow (n = 174) or (iii) verbal IS followed by a theater (n = 145). All modes of information covered the same key messages. Participants’ understanding was assessed using a semi-structured questionnaire. The mean score of caregivers in the control group (ICF only) was 4.41 (standard deviation = 1.47). Caregivers attending the IS alone were more knowledgeable than those in the control group (estimated difference in mean scores: 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95 to 2.86, p < 0.01). However, there was no evidence of an improvement compared to the IS only when participants attended a slideshow (0.09, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.35, p = 0.68) or a theater (0.28, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.82, p = 0.32). Three out of 10 key messages remained largely misunderstood, regardless of the mode of information group.
Conclusions/significance
Our study confirmed that, in this setting, an ICF alone was not sufficient to convey clinical trial-related information. An IS was beneficial, however, additional theater and slideshows did not further improve understanding. Future research should explore methods to improve communication between study teams and participants for different key messages, study types and settings.

Effect of Conventional vs. Multimedia Aid Regarding Informed Consent for Central Venous Catheter Insertion on Anxiety and Satisfaction among Patients Admitted in Selected Areas of A Tertiary Care Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab

Effect of Conventional vs. Multimedia Aid Regarding Informed Consent for Central Venous Catheter Insertion on Anxiety and Satisfaction among Patients Admitted in Selected Areas of A Tertiary Care Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab
Ramit Sharma, Kapil Sharma
International Journal of Nursing Critical Care, 2021; 7(1)
Open Access
Abstract
Central venous catheter insertion is a very invasive procedure for prolonged administration of medication, parental fluids and blood products. Patients are involved in decision making regarding this procedure. The term Informed consent is used to discuss with patients complete, clear and easy to understand information about a medical procedure or surgical process in clinical settings or hospitals. Multimedia patient decision aid have been heavily utilized as supplemental educational tools instead of conventional method. A quasi-experimental study by using convenience sampling technique was conducted on 40 patients (control n = 20 and experimental n = 20) admitted in ICUs of DMC & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab. In pre-test assess the anxiety of patients for regarding central venous catheter insertion (CVC insertion) procedure done by (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scale.)) and in intervention (Provide multimedia aid regarding informed consent for central venous catheter insertion procedure) for each patients for 5 mints (only in experimental group) and in posttest assess and compare the anxiety and satisfaction of patients by (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scale.) and satisfaction by using modified Agency for Healthcare Researcher and quality (AHRQ) scale. Patient satisfaction with the consent process, Most of the subjects had severe anxiety among control and experimental group in pre-test and post-test (16 vs. 15), whereas the 15 (75%) subjects among experimental group had severe anxiety in pre-test which was decreased to moderate in post-test. The finding of the present study also revealed that mean anxiety score was decreased from pre-test and post-test among experimental group (52.00 ± 04.34 Vs. 42.10 ± 05.70) and control group (54.35 ± 05.15 Vs. 50.15 ± 05.61). The difference in finding were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). It was also revealed that all the subjects were satisfied with the multimedia (14.5 ± 1.28). Whereas only 3 (15%) subjects were satisfied (8.3 ± 1.84) with conventional method. The present study concluded that multimedia aid regarding informed consent for CVC insertion is better than the conventional aid in reference to the anxiety and satisfaction of the patients.

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the challenge to treatment without consent of individuals with psychosocial disabilities [BOOK CHAPTER]

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the challenge to treatment without consent of individuals with psychosocial disabilities [BOOK CHAPTER]
Bernadette McSherry, Lisa Waddington
Routledge, Human Rights Education for Psychologists, 2020
Abstract
This chapter explores the developing emphasis on human rights in mental health care and treatment and what it means in particular for the compulsory treatment of individuals with psychosocial disabilities. Informed consent to treatment is generally presumed to be central to the provision of good-quality health care. However, many countries have mental health laws that enable the detention and treatment without consent of individuals with “psychosocial disabilities”. Awareness of the need to support people with psychosocial disabilities to make their own decisions is an obvious starting point for promoting human rights in this area. Psychologists and professional associations may have a role in ensuring that mental health care and treatment are provided on a voluntary basis as much as possible. The chapter provides an overview of the conceptual aspects of human rights and compulsory mental health treatment and analyse what the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities may mean for the practice of human rights-based treatment.

“Fostering Autonomy” for Adolescents to Access Health Services: A Need for Clarifications

“Fostering Autonomy” for Adolescents to Access Health Services: A Need for Clarifications
Commentary
Julien Brisson, Vardit Ravitsky, Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal of Adolescent Health, 1 June 2021; 68(6) pp 1038-1039
Excerpt
The global health literature studying adolescent health issues has shown that adolescents are among the groups that least use health services despite having serious health-related needs [[1]]. To help promote adolescent health, the World Health Organization’s Global Accelerate Action for the Health of Adolescents advocates implementing measures to “foster the autonomy” of adolescents to access health services ([[2]], p.93). The argument is persuasive: protect the well-being of adolescents. However, there are significant challenges to understanding what is actually meant by “fostering autonomy” and the possible or necessary steps required for adolescents to be able to both choose and have access to health services. For example, fostering autonomy could entail the development of decision-making skills (e.g., knowing how, when, and where to access health services) or the implementation of enabling policies to make health services more accessible for adolescents, such as removing financial or geographic barriers that impede access…

Assessment of Factors Associated With Parental Perceptions of Voluntary Decisions About Child Participation in Leukemia Clinical Trials

Assessment of Factors Associated With Parental Perceptions of Voluntary Decisions About Child Participation in Leukemia Clinical Trials
Original Investigation
Paula Aristizabal, Arissa K. Ma, Nikhil V. Kumar
JAMA Network Open, 4 May 2021; 4(5)
Open Access
Abstract
Importance
Obtaining voluntary informed consent prior to enrollment in clinical trials is a fundamental ethical requirement.
Objective
To assess whether health literacy, contextual factors, or sociodemographic characteristics are associated with perception of voluntariness among parents who had consented for their child’s participation in a leukemia therapeutic clinical trial.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This cross-sectional study prospectively enrolled 97 parents of children diagnosed as having leukemia at Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, a large tertiary academic center in California, from 2014 to 2017. Health literacy, contextual factors (acculturation, decisional regret, and satisfaction with informed consent), sociodemographic characteristics, and perception of voluntariness after consenting for a therapeutic clinical trial were measured. Univariable and multivariable regression were used to determine significant associations. The analyses for the present study were conducted from May 2019 to May 2020.
Exposures
Informed consent for a therapeutic leukemia clinical trial.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary outcome of interest was perception of voluntariness and its associations with health literacy and other contextual factors (acculturation, decisional regret, and satisfaction with informed consent) and sociodemographic characteristics, including age, race/ethnicity, parental language, educational level, insurance type, marital status, and socioeconomic status.
Results
Of 97 parents included, the majority were women (65 [67%]), married (71 [73%]), and of self-reported Hispanic ethnicity (50 [52%]). Lower perception of voluntariness was significantly associated with lower health literacy (r = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.47; P = .004), Spanish language (x̅ = −4.50, P = .05), lower acculturation if of Hispanic ethnicity (r = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.02-0.54; P = .05), greater decisional regret (r = −0.54; 95% CI, −0.67 to −0.38; P < .001), and lower satisfaction with informed consent (r = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.54; P < .001) in univariable analysis. Lower health literacy remained significantly associated with lower perception of voluntariness in multivariable analysis after adjustment for contextual factors and sociodemographic characteristics (β = 4.06; 95% CI, 1.60-6.53; P = .001). Lower health literacy was significantly associated with Hispanic ethnicity (mean, 4.16; 95% CI, 3.75-4.57; P < .001), Spanish language spoken at home (mean, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.94-4.40; P < .001), high school or less educational level (mean, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.83-3.99; P < .001), public insurance (mean, 4.00; 95% CI, 3.55-4.45; P < .001), and unmarried status (mean, 3.71; 95% CI, 2.91-4.51; P = .03).
Conclusions and Relevance
Among parents of children with newly diagnosed leukemia who had consented for their child’s participation in a therapeutic clinical trial, lower perception of voluntariness was significantly associated with lower health literacy. These results suggest that parents with low health literacy may perceive external influences in their decision for their child’s participation in clinical trials. This finding highlights the potential role of recruitment interventions tailored to the participant’s health literacy level to improve voluntary informed consent in underserved populations.

Negotiating the practicalities of informed consent in the field with children and young people: learning from social science researchers

Negotiating the practicalities of informed consent in the field with children and young people: learning from social science researchers
Gina Sherwood, Sarah Parsons
Research Ethics, 12 April 2021
Open Access
Abstract
The real-world navigation of ethics-in-practice versus the bureaucracy of institutional ethics remains challenging. This is especially true for research with children and young people who may be considered vulnerable by the policies and procedures of ethics committees but agentic by researchers. Greater transparency is needed about how this tension is navigated in practice to provide confidence and effective strategies for social researchers, including those new to the field, for negotiating informed consent. Twenty-three social science researchers with a range of experience were interviewed about their practices for gaining informed consent from children and young people in social research and the development of their ‘ethics in practice’ over time. Main themes focused on navigating ethics protocols within institutions, practices to prepare for data collection, and a critical evaluation of the resources that can be applied to gaining consent and managing relationships. A range of methods and concrete steps that address ethical challenges are outlined to illustrate what can be done in practice to achieve authentic consent and appropriate participation.